Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 6/21/01 2:17 PM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's hard to imagine anything less useful than those (at this point of
> > time),
> > but we should stick to the policy.
> >
> > Rafal
>
> The usefulness is not the question/problem...it is breaking people's code
> that I am concerned with.
My point is that code depends on these deserves getting broken :)
> Remove them in 2.2 but mark them deprecate in 2.1.x
+1, I know that his is the Right Thing...
--
mgr inz. Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
