RE: [proposal] move om/peer generation to tdk

[Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo]

> > * remove blobs (they where never used for group, role, ...
> 
> +1

+1

> > * rename GROUP to something different (REALM was proposed 
> some time ago)
> 
> +1 realm sounds good to me, are there any other choices that 
> make sense?

+1, realm

> > * we talked about adding a user-attributes table (so we can 
> get rif of perm
> > storage)
> 
> +1 

+1


-- 
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]