Fedor Karpelevitch wrote:
> > > Could anyone put in my torque patches in before that, please?
> >
> > Which ones?
> >
> > I think I applied your patches to HEAD, but not to the 2.1 branch.
> > Martin is looking after the 2.1 branch so just refresh our memory.
>
> Yes. I just want to make sure that whoever maanges 2.1 branch will put those
> patches in before tagging a release.
we could also include torque.jar in 2.x
> Also, on a slightly related note (although it does not affect me
> personally), I do not think that it is a good idea to deprecate stuff in
> 2.1.1 which was not deprecated in 2.1; it does not seem to be in line with
> what I consider normal stable-release semantics and although Turbine
> Deprecation doc does not seem to cover this case it seems to me a rule of
> thumb that what is supported and not deprecated in 2.1 can only be
> deprecated in 2.2 as a developer working with 2.1 (me :-)) would expect that
> if he used a particular class with 2.1 he will not get any problems
> (including deprecation messages) when upgrading to 2.1.1 as this is supposed
> to be bugfix/minor update release only.
we can call it 2.2
martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
