> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Poeschl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: deprecation for 2.1.1
>
>
> Fedor Karpelevitch wrote:
>
> > > > Could anyone put in my torque patches in before that, please?
> > >
> > > Which ones?
> > >
> > > I think I applied your patches to HEAD, but not to the 2.1 branch.
> > > Martin is looking after the 2.1 branch so just refresh our memory.
> >
> > Yes. I just want to make sure that whoever maanges 2.1
> branch will put those
> > patches in before tagging a release.
>
> we could also include torque.jar in 2.x
>
> > Also, on a slightly related note (although it does not affect me
> > personally), I do not think that it is a good idea to
> deprecate stuff in
> > 2.1.1 which was not deprecated in 2.1; it does not seem to
> be in line with
> > what I consider normal stable-release semantics and although Turbine
> > Deprecation doc does not seem to cover this case it seems
> to me a rule of
> > thumb that what is supported and not deprecated in 2.1 can only be
> > deprecated in 2.2 as a developer working with 2.1 (me :-))
> would expect that
> > if he used a particular class with 2.1 he will not get any problems
> > (including deprecation messages) when upgrading to 2.1.1 as
> this is supposed
> > to be bugfix/minor update release only.
>
> we can call it 2.2
I would still like to have 2.1.1 as a bugfix release.
Not sure what 2.2 would be.
>
> martin
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
