On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:22:40AM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After some discussion on Friday in #turbine, we decided that Torque
> will move toward becoming a self contained, stand-alone persistence
> layer.
>
> The upshot is that the code that is currently in the DBService will be
> moved into the Torque repository so that Torque will function independently.
> The DBService in Fulcrum will become a service wrapper for Torque.
>
> We also hope that Torque will become a JDO implementation. With the
> complete separation of Torque as a persistence layer we're hoping we
> attract more developers and users.
>
> --
>
> jvz.
>
> Jason van Zyl
>
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
> http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Just FYI. I like very much Scott Ambler's design and paper on
persistence layer. Robust, small, elegant
(http://www.ambysoft.com/persistenceLayer.html - altough I'm sure,
most of you know this address). There is a one-man-show somewhere
in Russia, a certain Artyom Rudoy has implemented this framework
pretty completely (http://artyomr.narod.ru/ or recently
http://player.sourceforge.net). I think it would be meaningful
to merge "pl" with "torque" as "pl" misses a generator and Torque
could gain a very concise target. (Didn't talk to Mr. Rudoy,
he holds his own license on the software, it's free, just you
have to retain his name in your work based on "pl".)
incze
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
