Zitiere josh lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > A: 2.1.1 bug-fix release
> > -1 : 2
> > +1 : 1
> > 
> > B: 2.2 bug-fix + deprecation release
> > -1 : 2 (fedor, josh)
> > +1 : 7
> > 
> > C: breaking our deprecation rules
> > -1 : 1 (martin)
> > +1 : 1
> > 
> > it's very bad to define rules and break them 2 weeks later!!!
> > 
> > B is most preffered, but we have 2 -1!!
> > fedor, josh could you please think about it?!?
> > i think deprecation warnings are not that bad!
> > most people will never see them because i don't know if anyone is
> using castor,
> > freemarker or webmacro ...
> > 
> >
> 
> i will remove my -1 on B if we have the assurance that 2.2 will be
> released before 3.0 (i'm sure it will but I want to say it) and if the
> deprecation is documented by more than just compiler warnings.

no problem!
thanx

martin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to