jvanzyl     01/07/26 14:03:51

  Modified:    .        NOTES
  Log:
  - adding notes on what should be done next with torque.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.3       +25 -1     jakarta-turbine-torque/NOTES
  
  Index: NOTES
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-turbine-torque/NOTES,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- NOTES     2001/07/24 00:46:56     1.2
  +++ NOTES     2001/07/26 21:03:51     1.3
  @@ -7,4 +7,28 @@
     in Fulcrum. The classes should be moved from Fulcrum into
     this repository and Torque should be made to work on its own
     and be embeddable in applications. The DBService in Fulcrum
  -  should be a wrapper around Torque.
  +  should be a wrapper around a Torque.
  +
  +o Separate the connection pool and make it pluggable
  +  so that torque can easily be integrated into other application
  +  that already use PoolMan, or the commons connection pool, or
  +  the struts connection pool or whatever
  +
  +o XML an configuration
  +
  +o Use the digester to turn the datamodel into an object and
  +  get rid of the dependency on xerces. It would be nice to 
  +  use the digester with MinML so that the distribution can
  +  be tiny
  +
  +o Get rid of the Log wrapper in all the code and use the log4j
  +  Category c = Category.getInstance(classname) method so
  +  that torque can easily be integrated into other apps. Either
  +  log4j or the logging API will dominate and I'm going to take
  +  log4j. But as Ceki has noted they are so similar it is very
  +  easy to change from one to the other
  +
  +o Some analysis on what we actually have would be prudent. Torque
  +  is somewhat based on the work of Scott Ambler and I would like
  +  to know where it is the same and where it diverges so we know
  +  what we're dealing with.
  
  
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to