----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: Fulcrum Separation
>
> The Java Apache "standards" have so far dicated that the top level package
> name reflect top level projects. Fulcrum is not a top level project, I'm
> not saying that this issue about package name "standards" can't be
> discussed on General@Jakarta, I'm just saying that this has been the
> history to date.
Standard??? well we allready have
org.apache.log (Avalon Logkit)
org.apache.testlet (Avalon testlet)
org.apache.service (Tomcat is creating a new service framework i guess) see
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/service/java/Service.java?r
ev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup if you don't believe me
org.apache.jasper34 (Tomcat)
org.apache.tools (Ant)
Didn't bother looking for more, im sure there are at least 10-20 more
So I guess this isn't much of a standard.
im +1 on org.apache.fulcrum
- Kasper
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
