Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 8/21/01 2:35 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I am working on correcting this.  The issue is that the TorqueSQLTask
> > now needs access to the database adapters.
> 
> Why? I don't think that's very good. I would eventually like to use the SQL
> generation stand-alone and this addition will make that very hard. Isn't
> there any other way?

For solid SQL generation, I need to the RDBMS-specific maximum column
length.  The natural place for this is the DB adapters (since they
hold database-specific idiosyncrasies).  I am open to other
suggestions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to