AFAIU the problem for you is that you are trying to get _new_ TDK to work
with _old_ turbine. I do not see why this is needed and doubt that is
possible at all in the long run (when turbine 2 & 3 become more different).
And who needs that anyway? If you want TDK to work with two versions of
turbine you need two TDKs...

fedor.

-------------------------------
The Joy of CVS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Torque and 2.1
> 
> 
> On 9/10/01 12:45 PM, "Fedor Karpelevitch" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > seems to be a change too big for a stable branch...
> > since old torque is being used (unlike those freemaker & 
> castor things) it
> > seems inapropriate to remove it.
> 
> That's fine. We have no real way to know how people are using 
> the db code in
> the 2.x tree so maybe it is best to use the Torque code in 
> the 2.x tree.
> It's a maintenance hassle for sure but it may eventually be a 
> bigger PITA to
> get the new torque stuff to work with 2.x.
> 
> Anyone else have any thoughts?
> 
>  
> > fedor.
> > 
> > -------------------------------
> > The Joy of CVS
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:39 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Torque and 2.1
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> If we are going to attempt to use the new torque in 2.x 
> than we should
> >> probably 
> >> 
> >> 1) Remove the torque related code from the 2.x tree
> >> 2) Create adapter classes (I've only found Criteria so far) so that
> >>    no code has to be changed.
> >> 
> >> If people agree that we do this are there many things to be
> >> aligned between
> >> the torque code in the 2.x tree and the
> >> jakarta-turbine-torque repository?
> >> 
> >> Martin and I are working on the TDK today so if there is
> >> agreement that we
> >> use the new Torque in the 2.x branch than it can be cleaned
> >> up today as this
> >> is one of the last issues to clear up before releasing a TDK.
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> 
> >> jvz.
> >> 
> >> Jason van Zyl
> >> 
> >> http://tambora.zenplex.org
> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -- 
> 
> jvz.
> 
> Jason van Zyl
> 
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
> http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to