In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Rall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>In 2.0, user.hasLoggedIn() does not gate population of the context
>with session tools from the User's permanent storage (so it always
>happens).
>
>Are both these implementations correct for their respective versions,
>or is a modification to one of them in order?
Looks to me as though 2.x should work as 3.0, no point populating with
persistent tools for a non-logged in user.
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Je suis un homme: rien d'humain en m'est �tranger
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
