Gunnar R�nning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > > | > | I think it's a good idea that one XML file contains one database. Now > | > > | > Could you please clean up the terminology a little ? We are talking about > | > an XML schema, but what is the definition of a database ? Mayve you mean > | > SQL schema, but call it database ? > | > | I mean the same thing by database as what you are probably familiar with: an > | entity which stores an arbitrary set of tables and relations. > > I think it would be better to use the term "database schema", as "database" > alone is rather ambigous.
I'm +1 on such a change. The patch would have to be to both the DTD and code to maintain backwards compatibility (similar to the idmethod="native" patch). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
