well, for those of us not battle-hardened in a licence debate or just simply new to the list(e.g. myself) _and_ looking for a response with actual useful information, here's the meat of Daniel Rall's informative post:
Code licensed solely under the LGPL will not be included in ASF software, as it violates terms of the ASL <http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/license.html>. The original author (copyright holder) of the LGPL'd code can provide another release of their code under a license compatible with the ASL (thus dual-licensing their code). so nyah! :P russ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "turbine-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 11:55 PM Subject: Re: ideas for Torque > on 11/23/01 4:12 PM, "Russ Trotter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > forgive me if I step on any toes, but is there anything _wrong_ with being > > under LGPL? :) > > > > russ > > forgive me if I step on any toes, but why does someone always have to ask > this question? > > -jon > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
