Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Is there any reason by we can't define everything in default.properties like > we were doing in build.properties?
I don't see any reason why not. Using default.properties allows people to personalize project properties using a project/build.properties file, while supplying reasonable defaults for the properties used by the build.xml file. I believe that this is customary in a few other Jakarta projects as well. > If this method is working well in other > projects (dlr mentioned using it) than I will use the same method in the TDK > but I don't really like defining properties in the top-level of the > build.xml file. Neither do I. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
