Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't see any reason why not. Using default.properties allows > people to personalize project properties using a > project/build.properties file, while supplying reasonable defaults for > the properties used by the build.xml file. I believe that this is > customary in a few other Jakarta projects as well.
...though most of those other projects inline their defaults into their build.xml file, unfortunately. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
