on 10/17/01 1:53 PM, "Steve Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I would like to suggest changing the Torque Object.vm template to >>> use a variation of the JavaName parameter to create the object field >>> names instead of using the DB column name. My reason for wanting to >>> do this is so that bean introspection of the field name would find > the >>> appropriate setters and getters. > >> I'm confused. I thought we were already doing this. > > I did a cvs update on the jakarta-turbine-torque project so I should > have the latest code. When I run Torque standalone with the latest > templates it names the fields as a variation of the name parameter from > the schema xml file. I'm sorry, but your patch doesn't really explain what the problem is. -jon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
