ok, so the misinformation is cleared up : ) I was referring to Torque-standalone however. We're not using Turbine in our app.
So, I take this time to reiterate, can anyone comment on whether it's wise for me to make a patch that add 'type=InnoDB' to torque standalone? russ Scott Eade wrote: >From: "Russ Trotter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>I just made some simple snippet of SQL that created an InnoDB table type >>with a BLOB column and it worked with inserts at the mysql command >>prompt.. Are you saying there are torque issues here or am I missing >>something? >> > >Sorry for the miss-information. I must have been recalling something from >an old version. It appears that InnoDB does in fact support blobs. > >My comment concerning the DB security service still applies - changes >to users, groups, etc using TurbineSecurity cannot be included in your >transactions as DBSecurityService and DBUserManager do not cater >for them. > >Cheers, > >Scott > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
