Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not expecting that a single statement will work with all the databases. > We will continue to have templates for each of the database vendors to > account for all the irregularities: all I'm really interested in doing is > getting rid of having to create shell scripts and batch files in order to > create the databases. Even if the SQL was different for each of the > databases, most of them are the same though, we can use the <sql> task to > create the databases instead of native scripts.
I concur w/ Jason. The database descriptors will be able to handle most irregularities. >> Do you have access to SQL99 standard ? > > I'm sure I could dig it up if I had to :-) I've found O'Reilly's "SQL In A Nutshell" to be a decent SQL99 reference. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
