+1, I think this change makes for descriptor which are more easily
read.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> jvanzyl     02/01/14 20:56:31
>
>   Modified:    src/test/org/apache/stratum/xo/classname container.xml
>   Log:
>   - we are going to use the convention:
>   
>     <items>
>       <item className="x.y.z.BigItem"/>
>     </items>
>   
>     where we use the attributes as mapping information, the
>   
>     <items>
>       <item>
>         <className>x.y.z.BigItem</className>
>       </item>
>     </items>
>   
>     doesn't follow this patter, and i don't want to allow both because
>     it's ambiguous and i think using attributes strictly for mapping
>     information and body elements as object attributes more consistent.
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.2       +2 -6      
>jakarta-turbine-stratum/src/test/org/apache/stratum/xo/classname/container.xml
>   
>   Index: container.xml
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: 
>/home/cvs/jakarta-turbine-stratum/src/test/org/apache/stratum/xo/classname/container.xml,v
>   retrieving revision 1.1
>   retrieving revision 1.2
>   diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
>   --- container.xml   15 Jan 2002 03:42:26 -0000      1.1
>   +++ container.xml   15 Jan 2002 04:56:31 -0000      1.2
>   @@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
>    <container>
>      <items>
>   -    <item>
>   -      <className>org.apache.stratum.xo.classname.Item1</className>
>   -    </item>
>   -    <item>
>   -      <className>org.apache.stratum.xo.classname.Item2</className>
>   -    </item>
>   +    <item className="org.apache.stratum.xo.classname.Item1"/>
>   +    <item className="org.apache.stratum.xo.classname.Item2"/>
>      </items>
>    </container>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to