> I have made a branch called "rundata_security_changes" where I am going to > start the RunData changes. Gonzalo and Dan, this is where we will > work until > the default security implementation works with our new plan.
Got it, compiled it, ready to start working on it... By the way, update-jars is SO WONDERFUL! > So I'll make the RunData changes and then you two (Gonzalo and > Dan) can take a bit of time to work out exactly what you think is best. Ok. Are we still waiting on your writeup regarding the security model, or should we start on our own? > I was chatting with Jeff yesterday and I think the next thing to > tackle on a > first pass is development methodology. The CVS model of the TDK > works pretty > much like Scarab but I would like to clean up the torque stuff, add some > cactus testing for the client side and introduce some continuous > integration > techniques using Maven. I think automated, unsupervised unit tests are a very good approach. > 2) Will allow the TDK to work with an already installed version > of a servlet container >From all the postings on the list, it seems this would be good. > Jason van Zyl -- Gonzalo A. Diethelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
