On 2/8/02 8:02 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/02 10:17 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> James Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> The configuration package contains an interface for accessing config >>> data. One implementation of Configuration is properties based, which is >>> similar to / based on ExtendedProperties. However using the >>> configuration package allows use of other (yet to be implemented) >>> configuration formats. An XML one is planned (the empty class is already >>> there). In the future others will exist, or users can implement their >>> own, and configure fulcrum, torque, or turbine with it. >> >> +1. The .properties-style Configuration implementation should >> subclass ExtendedProperties. > > No, I don't think this is right. A lot of the code was borrowed from the > ExtendedProperties and the core can be used in the BaseConfiguration but the > I/O should be removed from the ExtendedProperties and the resources package > should be removed. Sorry, that's the "resource package should be used". Not enough coffee in the bloodstream yet. > I would also like to fix some problems that are in the > ExtendedProperties. > > The current user list of the ExtendedProperties is more then likely Turbine > and Velocity. I believe the reworked configuration that uses the resources > package will be a much better solution. > >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
