Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2/9/02 1:49 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> First off, let me say that I am not against the idea of a "selector" >> for multiple pipelines. It's just the suggested implementation that I >> have issues with. >> >> Even though I don't think that even optional pipeline capabilities >> should be programmable from XML, I will not -1 its inclusion (on an >> optional basis). However, I will not support promotion of such >> facilities in the Turbine documentation > > What does that mean exactly? You won't write documentation yourself > promoting this method, or that you will prevent someone else from doing it. > >From the tone it sounds like the latter.
The latter. But after talking with James on IRC, it looks like our ideas are actually much closer than I had first thought, so much so that I was able to take his base Valve and easily subclass it from my branch point suggestion. Dan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
