> Mathieu, you have my +1 to modify the Torque Java source and Velocity > templates to throw TorqueException instead of Exception. This is a > fully backwards compatible change, and we can debate at length whether > TorqueException should be a checked or unchecked exception _after_ the > change is made. > > Thanks, Dan
Just to clarify: I agree that this is good (note - i did not vote against it). My point is that this solves only part of the problem - that is, throwing too generic exception, but does not solve the other problem that is, declaring implementation-specific exception in the API thus binding API to it's particular implementation. I am afraid there would have to be a second round of changes and I do not see why same job needs to be done twice. fedor. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
