Stephane, > If there is any problem about performance I'm 150% sure that > Daniel Savarese > can give us some hints but I'm quite certain that Oro is faster > in the long > run (about twice the speed if not more when there is no match). It is also > more reliable.
The substitutions JRCS make are really simple. The reason I originally used a regexp package was because it made the implementation of keyword substitution really easy. Performance was not an issue. The performance problem with the current implementation is that each text line is checked for every one of the 9 keywords. If performance becomes an issue, that needs to be addressed. BTW (where do bugs go?) BUG: JRCS does not currently handle the "expand" entry of RCS archives. Juanco -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
