I guess you realize that Scarab is not the only project using Torque... Are you planning on fixing them all? :-)
-- fedor. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:38 AM > To: 'Turbine Developers List' > Cc: 'Daniel Rall' > Subject: RE: [PATCH] Standardizing OM for throwing > TorqueException (1/3) > > > Great then. Now, how can we tackle this update? Should we > discuss the > issue with Scarab's people first, or simply submit them > patches afterwards > once Torque has been updated? > > -- Mathieu > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Rall > Sent: February 27, 2002 12:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'Turbine Developers List' > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Standardizing OM for throwing > TorqueException (1/3) > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mathieu Frenette) writes: > > > First, thank you very much for taking the time to go over > the patches. > > > > Regarding the BasePeer patch, what did I do wrong with it? > Just want to > > know, so I can do it right the next time... ;-) > > AFAIK, you didn't do anything wrong with it. The class was just > changed too much in between the time you created your patch and now. > I would like to see the patch applied, so I updated it for CVS HEAD as > it stands today. > > Now we just need to get Fulcrum, T2 and T3, and Scarab updated... > > Dan > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
