On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 20:17, Warner Onstine wrote: > Hi all, > After looking at Maven, I am really beginning to like it! I am seriously > thinking about moving my existing Turbine projects over to it.
I wouldn't jump just yet :-) I'm planning on doing some stuff to specifically make turbine apps easier to develop. Again, pop into the chat room if you want to throw around some ideas. > Here are some of the issues I see right now: > If I have a dependency on turbine 2.2 (dev version) I have to declare all of > the files that it is dependent on. > If there is another jakarta project I rely on (say workflow for example) the > same applies. This will be resolved shortly using dependency graphs. I haven't checked anything in yet, but David Peugh completely rewrote the commons graph package (it uses maven to build :-)) so I have to integrate it into maven. It's even got a funky XMI parser that will read output from Rational Rose and ArgoUML. Cool! > It would be nice if I could simply declare one or two depencies and then > Maven could figure out the rest when I do updates. > > Is this the plan, or how would this be addressed? Yup it's in the works. Using proper dependency graphs, and specifically the newly rewritten graph package in the commons sandbox. > -warner > > +warner onstine+ > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
