on 3/25/02 4:50 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but I'm not the only developer here. You can do just as much as I > can to make the Gump build work. I'm taking a different approach which I > feel will be sustainable in the long. I consider the failures temporary. > I don't agree with the way Gump works, but that shouldn't stop you from > editing the gump descriptors. But I also don't feel comfortable fixing things because the way I would do things is much differently than the way that you would do things. > If you are looking to build against sources you have > checked out then I can do that. I think I have been saying that all along. Gump is the same thing. Building against sources one has checked out. > I'm not going to stop trying to make Maven work and it's not only me at > this point. For this one aspect of Turbine, there has never been more > cooperation among our developers in trying to get Maven to work. I don't > believe I'm alone when I say that I think Maven will ultimately make > this whole process easier and make the inter project processes easier > too. When? -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
