I see no need for project.properties. It should be changed to
default.properties Jason.
I like the idea of users being able to define ${project}.build.properties
though.
-jon
on 3/29/02 4:24 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 06:09, Jeff Turner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see that all other Turbine projects use 'default.properties', but
>> Maven uses 'project.properties'. Any specific reason for that, or can it
>> be changed? If 'default.properties' is the standard, can it be
>> documented in dirlayout.xml? :)
>
> There is a default.properties used within Maven and the
> project.properties came from the pattern in the TDK. We also tried to
> match project.xml with project.properties to make things a little more
> consistent. What's in default.properties can be used by any project and
> what is in project.properties will override that. We will document that.
>
>> Some people are trying to shamelessly copy your layout, and
>> inconsistency confuses us ;P
>
> Point taken, thanks.
>
>> thanks,
>>
>> --Jeff
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Standard rules apply: Ask any questions, and you get the job. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
