"Martin van den Bemt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm I have to withdraw my statement that it works. > If you mean by working "do you see a screen?" I must say yes > By meaning : is it useable : absolutely NO. > You can debate about how accessable scarab is anyway (just want a query > of all bugs which concern turbine, which looks impossible to get) > and I get (after 10 minutes or so) a Bad Gateway (502) error doing a > query with a message saying : error reading from remote server. > > Hope bugzilla can be reinstated for all turbine issues, so we have a > workable system. > Maybe I am not too flexible at this point and my judgement made of the > system is completely based on the useabiliy, which is zero (except for > logging into scarab). > > Pier is on the cc list, because the error said that I had to contact him > if I think there was a server error ;).. > Search in the logs for May 25, 04:39:21 2002 It happened then ;)
Martin, the copy we have on Nagoya is _really_ old. You should base your judgment on the latest snapshot, which you can see at http://scarab.whichever.com/ Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. [Jamie Zawinski - DNA Lounge - San Francisco] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
