On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 07:31, James Taylor wrote: > On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 05:52, Colm McCartan wrote: > > At 22:51 04/06/2002 -0700, you wrote: > > >For what's it's worth, I think this is a great idea. > > > > > >-Peter > > > > > > > I do not want to start a debate or a huge long discussion about security > > > > here. I know there are a lot of issues about how it should be > > > > implemented. I have a simple question that has been on my mand recently > > > > :) This may be what some people have in mind already, I don't know. > > > > Isn't this what Jason Van Zyl proposed about 3 months ago...? > > And implemented in the rundata_security_changes branch. However that has > since had some SERIOUS purging done, and I'm not really sure what is > going on anymore =]
I figured I would just keep my mouth shut until I have a completely trimmed core finished and tested. Maybe I'll make a tarball and post it but I don't know if that would be a benefit or not at this point. > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
