I believe the highest character which is valid unencoded is '~' which is character 126, so this should be fine. I suppose we could even do c < 126, but I personally find 127 a little clearer since it implies the ASCII characters. Of course, it may only imply that to me because I wrote the code an already know what is going on =]
-- jt On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 20:52, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 6/18/02 5:43 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > + if ( c < 128 && safe[ c ] ) > > Is 128 a valid character though? Or, is it 0-127? > > ie: c <= 128 ? > > -jon > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
