> From: "Stephen Haberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> That's fine. In the proposal I have indicated that the bugzilla issues will >> be transferred manually. I am seeking clarification from Stephen on the -1 >> he gave to the proposals regarding the use of the existing un-maintained >> issues.apache.org/scarab instance by the OJB project. Here is the relevant >> text: > > Sounds good. I'll change my vote to a -0 as it should have been in the > first place. You're right, it's the OJB guys' call. > >> If I can get a clear +1 from Stephen and John (and obviously no -1's from >> elsewhere) I will kick this process off ASAP. > > Very nice. Thanks, Scott. > > - Stephen
As there are no -1 votes outstanding I will attempt to put this proposal into action (which doesn't necessarily mean me doing all of the work as varying levels of access are required to various systems). The Scarab modules will be (make noise if you disagree - silence is acceptance ;-): Global Global > Turbine Global > Turbine > Turbine-2 > Source Global > Turbine > Turbine-2 > Documentation Global > Turbine > Turbine-3 > Source Global > Turbine > Turbine-3 > Documentation Global > Turbine > Turbine Site Global > Turbine > Fulcrum > Source Global > Turbine > Fulcrum > Documentation Global > Turbine > TDK > Source Global > Turbine > TDK > Documentation Global > JCS > Source Global > JCS > Documentation For Torque do we want: Global > Turbine > Torque > Source Global > Turbine > Torque > Documentation or Global > Torque > Source Global > Torque > Documentation We can move the existing "Global > Torque" module to one of the above. Stephen: Can you please either create these or let me know how I might gain the necessary access to do it myself? Once they are up I will work on the other tasks in the proposal. Cheers, Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
