At 15:49 10.12.2002 -0800, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Everyone who doesn't want to standardize on a single logging implementation
should at least standardize on a single logging interface and that should be
commons-logging. If you have a problem with commons-logging, then it should
be addressed there, not re-implemented somewhere else.
Jon, you are absolutely right. The constructive attitude is to expose to
c-l developers their errors (as I perceive them). I must admit that I am
still in shock with respect to their choice of class loader based mechanism
for selecting the logging implementation.
-jon
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
