Hmmm... I did not mean it that way. I guess it did appear that way on the Wiki. I really meant to list three separate proposals. I just did nto have enough information on the Exception handling proposal to create new page yet.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rodney Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:59 PM > To: Turbine Developers List > Subject: ExceptionHandler [was Re: Changes to intake service] > > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:44, you wrote: > > I just completed backporting the the changes from T3's > > TurbineException and TurbineRuntimeException. I also changes > > SystemError to use NestableError from commons-lang. > > > > I will start looking at a configurable exception handler to T2.2. > > Hi Quinton, > > This is not just related to Intake exceptions, but is to do with the > way the Turbine 2.x servlet handles any exception that is > thrown while > Turbine is handling a request. Currently, Turbine 2.x resorts to > spitting the stacktrace down the servlet response and this may not be > desirable for many applications. I noticed in the wiki that you put > it under the section of an Intake enhancement, but it is really a > Turbine enhancement... > > -- Rodney > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:turbine-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
