I also really like the idea of services being packaged in separate jar files. Only the ones actually required to make Turbine would be left in the Turbine jar file.....
I am guessing that the services would load like the Torque component and be configured in the same way? > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:38 PM > To: Turbine Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RFC: Going to Servlet API 2.3+? [Was: Re: New > SessionService....] > > > On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > > > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >Hullo Fulcrum. > > > > :-) > > > > Actually, this would be Fulcrum without the classes in the > > org.apache.fulcrum package (but in the sub-packages). > > A one point we kicked around the idea for Fulcrum of > packaging services in individual JAR files. I was never a > fan of this idea, but am liking how things are turning out, > with generally useful service cores getting pushed into > Jakarta Commons, and Fulcrum services being simple wrappers around > these pieces of functionality. > > - Dan > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:turbine-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
