Stephen Haberman wrote:
The site is back up. Why do things always go wrong when you're gone? :)On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 04:02:25AM -0300, Gonzalo Diethelm wrote:If you can package it so that: * it compiles with HEAD, * it is pluggable and configurable via TR.props, * it provides the following implementations: DB-based (traditional Turbine style), XML-based and null (that is, no security, everything is allowed), then I would heartily stand by it as a Next Generation security service. Even more, I would push for having the null implementation as Turbine's default.I'm in initial agreement, though dan.envoisolutions.com isn't responding, so I can't give the API a more careful look. But if enough people like it, there is no reason Turbine (or more appropriately Fulcrum :-) can't have more than one security solution. Granted it'd be fragmented, but competition is a good thing, and the one with the most support/users could always win out in the end as the other is deprecated. - Stephen
I will work on it a bit tonight and post the stuff tomorrow. Be patient as I'm still travelling through Europe on vacation. I'll be intouch in the next day or two with more info. Thanks for the positive feedback!
- Dan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
