On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:08:11AM +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > But: To hell with deprecation. Interface compatibility, backward > compatibility and everything else. We will have a new code base that > shares some code with the current turbine. Then we can as well rename > it (just as Jason did with Plexus).
Just to clarify (you probably already understand, if anything, I'm justifying this to myself), we're not changing the interfaces of the services themselves, just how you initialize Fulcrum and then lookup services. My feeling is that these two steps, initialization and lookup, take up a small percentage of the code that uses Fulcrum or even the Turbine-2 services. So a straight forward conversion without the baggage of backwards compatibility/deprecation in _only_ the initialization/lookup part of it (that is also well documented, e.g. search, ideally automatically, your source and replace a with b and x with y) is not too much to ask of from users. - Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
