Fulcrum was never released.  There has also been some work backporting
code from Fulcrum into the turbine-2 code base.  I would anticipate that
there will be even more work to get the remaining services backported as
well.

The current plan is NOT to use Fulcrum for version 2.3.  We do want to
be able to Avalon components.  Considering that we want this ability in
2.3 and we don't currently use Fulcrum, I see no reason not to modify
Fulcrum to use Avalon.

Turbine users should have mostly stayed away from Fulcrum.  Those that
did move to Fulcrum should have noticed that they were using alpha/beta
code.  They chose to be on the bleeding edge.  Development version are
prone to being unstable.  I don't see the proposed changes as being much
of a problem.

I would like to see it working for just one or two services first,
though.  This would give us all a chance to see exactly how it will be
implemented.  This first phase of the Avalonization would be like a
proof of concept.  


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to