Also, the recent plans for Turbine's new service framework are somewhat overlapping with Tammi's JMX architecture. Our goal has been to keep the architecture as flat as possible by avoiding any hierarchical structures and I'd like to keep it that way.
But if the community accepts Tammi as the continuation of Turbine, I'd be the first for it.
-- Ilkka
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Why not make that Turbine 4.0? I would really support that. Tammi looks really good!-jon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
