On 21/03/2003 2:38 AM, "Quinton McCombs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone else have any comments on this? > >> -----Original Message----- >> >> Issue types: >> >> Remove the Feature, Task, and Patch issue types. All issues >> can be classified as a Defect or an Enhancement. Patches >> should always be attached to a Defect or an Enhancement issue. I quite liked the idea of Patch - a diligent committer that wanted to keep an eye on and apply patches could just check for open Patch issues. OTOH it is not like the volume of issues is at all significant and the way Scarab separates the issue types is quite annoying. The Task issue type could be useful as a container issue for doing something like a release (make all issues that are intended to be resolved for a release children of a task issue). Once again, the volume of issues is low so this is probably overkill. A Feature is just a large Enhancement - no reason for it not to go. <snip/> All of the remaining suggestions look good, assuming Scarab can accommodate them. I have Scarab admin access, but I am wary of making changes without some involvement by John McNally. If you recall I sought John's input when the addition of the version field was discussed some time ago, but no response was received. Not sure where John is at lately - I haven't seen any posts from him anywhere for some time now. Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au .Mac Chat/AIM: seade at mac dot com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
