> -----Original Message----- > From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 6:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Session pull tools need to be threadsafe?!?!??!?!? > > > "Quinton McCombs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Can someone explain to me why session scope tools need to be > >threadsafe? This does not make much sense to me. > > Wild guess: If a SecurityService whands out the same user > object for multiple logins of an user with the same name and > the tools are in the temp hash table, then multiple login > sessions get the same tool.
Okay... That makes a little more sense. However, I thought that the security service was handling out a new instance each time. I could be wrong... I have not look at that code for some time now. I don't think that TurbineUser is completely thread safe though... > Shouldn't be necessary any longer with your changes. > > Regards > Henning > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ > > Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services > freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
