> -----Original Message----- > From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Avalon container for 2.3 > > > Peter Courcoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >components, the question should be asked at what point does turbine > >switch from ECM. From what I understand fortress is a good candidate > >for replacing ECM. > > Turbine uses ECM? The only point that we currently use any > Avalon stuff is in the AvalonComponentService and this is, as > far as I can see, some excalibur and some framework stuff. > > I don't see us using any container anywhere. Am I wrong?
Yes. You are mistaken. ECM is used inside of the AvalonComponentService. > Regards > Henning > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ > > Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services > freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
