Yes, I got them. I was quite busy today and probably tomorrow, too. I'll give
it a spin on friday. Thanks for sending them.

        Regards
                Henning


"Colin Chalmers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>Henning ,

>Did you receive the IntakeService patches I sent yesterday to your personal
>email address?

>There were two zip files in total, first the new files followed by the diffs
>of the altered ones.

>Let me know if there are any probs.

>Colin

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Newsgroups: hometree.jakarta.turbine.dev
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:45 PM
>Subject: Re: IntakeService


>> "Colin Chalmers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >I'd like to check-in the changes I've made to the IntakeService as
>discussed
>> >earlier on the List. The changes are numerous but relatively small.
>> >Hopefully things should be a little clearer as to how it works and paves
>> >the road for further improvements after 2.3 is out the door.
>>
>> >I'll give a quick run-down here as to the main things that been
>> >added/altered. To whom should I send the new files/diffs??
>>
>> As you don't seem to have any user-visible changes (necessary changes to
>the
>> intake.xml file), I'm all +1 on this.
>>
>> If you have user visible changes, then I'm +0 unless you supply a
>> small "you must change this to get from there to here" file for the
>> docs. Then I'm +1 again. :-)
>>
>> Intake is an area where every patch helps. I'm still pretty amazed how
>> someone could conceive such a strange piece of code that actually does
>> something. My first contacts with intake still make me shudder when I
>> think back...
>>
>> So basically: I'm all for it. Do you have Committer right on the CVS?
>> If not, send the patches to me and I'll review and check in.
>>
>> Regards
>> Henning
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >Reasoning behind changes:
>>
>> >I was experiencing difficulty in validating (specifically) numbers, found
>> >the implementation of a number of validations to be unclear and found
>> >duplication of code. The validation of numbers was based on using
>BigDecimal
>> >for all number types. This has been seperated to support shorts/longs
>etc.
>> >which now all subclass an abstract NumberValidator which in turn
>subclasses
>> >an abstract DefaultValidator which as BaseClass contains all Rules/info
>> >which are common to all Validators. StringValidator is therefore a
>subclass
>> >of DefaultValidator and deals only with Strings as the name says.
>>
>> >UML diagram is available upon request.
>>
>> >1. package org.apache.turbine.services.intake.model;
>>
>> >Added:
>> >A) ShortField - to support Shorts
>> >B) LongField -  to support Longs
>>
>> >Changed:
>> >A) FieldFactory  - to support afore mentioned new Fields
>> >B) StringKeyField - deprecated
>>
>> >2. package org.apache.turbine.services.intake.validator;
>>
>> >Added:
>> >A) BigDecimalValidator - extends NumberValidator and validates
>BigDecimals
>> >B) DoubleValidator - extends NumberValidator and validates Doubles
>> >C) FloatValidator - extends NumberValidator and validates Floats
>> >D) LongValidator - extends NumberValidator and validates Longs
>> >E) ShortValidator - extends NumberValidator and validates Shorts
>> >F) StringValidator  - subclasses DefaultValidator and validates Strings
>>
>> >Changed:
>> >A) DefaultValidator - Abstract Base class for all Validators
>> >B) NumberValidator - Abstract class that extends DefaultValidator to deal
>> >with number types
>> >C) IntegerValidator - extends NumberValidator and validates Ints
>> >D) FileValidator - extends DefaultValidator
>>
>> >I'd like to have these changes tested by others, welcome feedback and
>will
>> >fix any probs should they emerge.
>>
>> >Colin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> --
>> Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/
>>
>> Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
>> freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>


>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/

Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services 
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to