To begin with, Thanx Henning for checking the stuff in and the small changes you implemented yourself.
These diff's additions are conform the discussions concerning IntakeService which have taken place on this List. Plz test current applications still work, they do for me. Let me know of any probs. and I'll look into it asap. As far as docs go: 1. I'll write up something for the changes doc. 2. I'll adapt the how-to to support new situation. 3. I'll add additional info/diagram to better show the hierarchy of rules which can now be applied and how to define them in the Intake.xml Colin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Quinton McCombs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Turbine Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 6:15 PM Subject: RE: IntakeService PATCH? > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:28 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: IntakeService PATCH? > > > > > > Colin, > > > > Have you thought about reviewing the HOWTO? To bring it up > > to date with your code? I used Intake a long time ago, and > > found it very frustrating to figure out.. I think the HOWTO > > just needs some updating/best practices stuff. > > A simply quick reference page showing the possible field types, > validators, and other configuration options would also be very helpful. > > > Eric > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Colin Chalmers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:50 AM > > To: Turbine Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: IntakeService PATCH? > > > > > > Sorry, thought it was obvious from other comments & > > discussions, I'll pay more attention next time. > > > > Colin > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:14 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: IntakeService PATCH? > > > > > > "Colin Chalmers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I'm currently working on this. > > > > Colin, if you _ever_ want to get patches attached in a faster > > manner, please pull out the current HEAD tree in a separate > > directory and then do > > > > diff -Nurb --exclude=CVS dir-of-current-head dir-of-your-modified tree > > > > Sending me dozens of files without directory hierarchy and > > single patches didn't exactly cut down the time that I needed > > to apply the patches and so they had to wait until I found > > the time to apply the stuff. > > > > Regards > > Henning > > > > -- > > Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ > > > > Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services > > freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
