=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Hoffmann?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ugh, right on the spot. :-)
That's the one where we have no real replacement. Replacement is to
use a data structure which adds a member only once but keeps its
sequence.
I once had such a bugger, called an OrderedSet, and this went into
commons collections as SequencedSet decorator. However, it will be
only available with the next commons collections release (the CVS
speaks of "3.0"). However, I deprecated this so I can remove it in the
2.4-dev cycle in favour of the SequencedSet. As far as I know, Martin
has a similar construct in the Torque code which could be replaced
with SequencedSet.
If you want to get rid of the deprecation warning, remove the
@deprecated =;-) Or get a commons-collections snapshot, replace the
underlying Sets with SequencedSet and replace all "addOnce" with
"add".
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
--- Quote of the week: "It is pointless to tell people anything when
you know that they won't process the message." --- Jonathan Revusky
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
