Thanks Henning (and Wei) - I'll get into this now (or perhaps when the sun comes up).
I have also added a pointer to this information on the Migrating from 2.2 page on the Wiki: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaTurbine2/Migrating_From_2.2
Scott
-- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
1. When I define the structure of CUSTOM_USER I want to do this
in the project schema file rather than the turbine schema file
so that I can have foreign keys to CUSTOM_USER. As a result I
will pretty much move everything from the turbine schema file
into my project's schema file (in order to have all of the
foreign-key references). Unlike in the past where I would
define a table as an alias of TurbineUser I should no longer
bother with this and just configure turbine to use the om
classes generated for my project. Is this correct?
Yes. The fact that Torque cannot generate foreign key references to tables which are not defined in the same schema is unfortunate (I have a project with currently 79 tables... ) but a torque limitation.
2. In "The elegant way" part of the Torque Security Service
page we have:
public class CustomUser extends TorqueUserCan you please clarify which class is extending what - I
assume when I generate my project om I will have CustomUser
extending BaseCustomUser extending BaseObject. Which specific
TorqueUser class is being extended and by which specific class.
This is two-layered.
There is the Torque generated stuff:
DATABASE_USER ---> DatabaseUser, DatabaseUserPeer, BaseDatabaseUser, BaseDatabaseUserPeer
Those classes do _not_ implement the necessary Security Object Interfaces (like User, Group, Role, Permission). So there is a layer in between which uses reflection to transfer fields from the database peers into our security objects. These objects are TorqueUser, TorqueGroup, TorquePermission, TorqueRole. If you use just the "normal" fields, you're done here. You configure the Security Service to return the Torque<xxx> objects and the TorqueSecurityService automagically maps all the needed information from the Torque generated peers.
Now, if you want to use custom columns, you must extend the objects implementing the Security interfaces. These are the Torque<xxx> objects:
package de.intermeta.application.security;
import org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUser;
public class ExtendedUser extends TorqueUser { ... }
This is still an object which implements "User". You configure the SecurityService (!) to return objects of this type as User objects:
services.SecurityService.user.class = de.intermeta.application.security.ExtendedUser
Note that this is the Security Service itself! Not the TorqueSecurityService!
Your custom user is then responsible to map the additional columns onto the underlying database peer object.
E.g. if you use
<table name="CUSTOM_USER" idMethod="idbroker"> [... turbine stuff ...] <column name="TELEPHONE" size="32" type="VARCHAR" javaName="Phone" /> </table>
as your database peer, you get
CUSTOM_USER ---> CustomUser, CustomUserPeer, BaseCustomUser, BaseCustomUserPeer
and you configure the TorqueSecurityService to use this as peer:
services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class = CustomUserPeer
public class ExtendedUser extends TorqueUser { public String getPhone() { return ((CustomUser) getPersistentObj()).getPhone(); }
getPersistentObj() gets the underlying Torque object, which is a CustomUser object (because we configured the TSS to use it as peer objects), so we can cast it. Then we can simply call getPhone() and return the value.
The "ExtendedUser" is an adapter between the Torque based objects and the security service objects (which must implement the Security Service interfaces).
Clearer now? I fixed some bugs in the torque-security-service.xml docs, too.
Regards
Henning
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
