Dan, I have made a lot of progress in the conversion process. Obviously things are done yet, but I would be very curious which services Scarab and Sourcecast use..
One of the services, BSF, I was thinking of ditching, as I can repackage it, but don't know how to use it.. I think it was a one off that went no where. At any rate, if you want to look at the repackage stuff, I wouldn't mind another set of eyes looking at the code. Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 2:35 AM > To: Turbine Developers List > Subject: Re: Need to deprecate services in T2.3? > > > I'm all for moving to the Fulcrum services, +1. As both Scarab and > SourceCast uses'em, I can offer maintainence support. > > - Dan > > Humberto Hernandez Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks, I will take a look. > > -- > > Humberto > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:01 PM > > > To: 'Turbine Developers List' > > > Subject: RE: Need to deprecate services in T2.3? > > > > > > > > > I have been putting in a fair amount of energy verifying that > > > the fulcrum > > > ones are uptodate with all the turbine services.. For > > > instance, pool had > > > some changes. So hopefully they will pick up the > improvements in the > > > turbine-2 services! > > > > > > Also, they each have a unit test verifying the service runs > > > in a container > > > and loads up. Which I think puts them ahead of the turbine-2 > > > version ;-). > > > > > > Having said that, I do expect others to go through and check > > > them out. To > > > honest, it really isn't that much code, and by removing all the > > > fulcrumservice/servicebroker/layers upon layers, the code > becomes much > > > easier to understand! > > > > > > Please be my guest to start looking at the ones that I have > > > repackaged. > > > > > > Eric Pugh > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Humberto Hernandez Torres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 6:42 PM > > > > To: Turbine Developers List > > > > Subject: RE: Need to deprecate services in T2.3? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mmh > > > > Are you sure that the best route is to migrate the > fulcrum services? > > > > > > > > It seems to me that the turbine-2 services have had better > > > > maintenance. > > > > -- > > > > Humberto > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:26 AM > > > > > To: 'Turbine Developers List' > > > > > Subject: Need to deprecate services in T2.3? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I just realized something.. If we are going to start using > > > > > the fulcrum > > > > > versions of services like Mimetype, pool, etc, don't we need > > > > > to mark them as > > > > > deprecate ASAP? As in before 2.3 goes out the door? > > > > > Otherwise we will have > > > > > to maintain them till 2.5 is released? If we mark them > > > > > deprecated in 2.3, > > > > > then in 2.4 we can start using them. And in 2.5 actually > > > > > remove the code... > > > > > > > > > > Is that correct? Am I understanding the rules for > deprecation? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
