Hi Eric > > On a somewhat seperate note, what are the reason's behind the > "turbine" > models intersection of user/group/role? I just don't quite
The user, group, role model is actually (IMHO) pretty flexible. I have used in several project and it seems to fit many situations. And I am sure it fits in the simple model that you ned to solve. However, We probably need to change the group because it is an unfortunate name. And it frecuently missunderstood. The idea is that every user has a role within a group. Examples that I've seen in real life: - You can have a catalog of products, but every departamente is managed by a differente person. Luis has the role manager whitin the pet departament. Pedro has the role manager within the clothes departament. Lupita is a manager in clothes and pets. Salma is the manager in all the departaments (global). - One company has many branch offices. Within each branch officer, you have a general manager, a sales manager, a purchase manager. In this case you have one group for each branch. - One site has several sections. One person is an editor in section one and a reviewer in section two. Another person is editor in all sections. In this case you have one group for each section. Basically, the group has a meaning that fits your needs. It is NOT a group of users as it is in Unix. > grok why it > works that way. Also, the torque code ONLY compiles. I don't use --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
