I just finished the commit.  Do you want to take the ball on trying to get
the hashmap out of the parameter parser?

I don't actually use intake, but it seems like many things rely on intake,
so I had to get it over to fulcrum before implementing it into turbine.  For
instance, the converting localization to fulcrum doesn't work without
converting to intake in fulcrum as well!

Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Chalmers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:50 PM
> To: Turbine Developers List
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine-2/xdocs changes.xml
>
>
> I have a first cut of Intake running as a Fulcrum Component..
> However, I
>
> >don't have your changes yet.  I would like to commit it
> today for review.
> >Colin, since you seem to understand Intake a lot, would you
> review the
> >changes I have made and I think that your refactoring for
> 2.4 should be made
> >in the fulcrum component, and the intake in 2.3 will be
> deprecated.  If you
> >are making things easier, then that will provide a clear incentive to
> >switch.
> >
>
> Cool, but I have to admit that the IntakeService still holds
> some grey
> areas for me.
>
> >
> >The intake service in fulcrum leverages the localization service from
> >fulcrum as well!
> >
> >The only difficulty I have is on the parameterparser and
> valueparser.  They
> >require a reference on Turbine 2.3.  Since I want to use the intake
> >component in a standalone use case, as well as using it with
> Scarab which
> >uses Turbine 3.0.
> >
> >So, what would be requried to ditch the
> paremeterparser/valueparser?  While
> >we could move them to fulcrum, in many ways they seem to be very http
> >request specific, and ought to not be used in Fulcrum.
> >
>
> Yeah as far as understand it Fulcrum shouldn't have any
> dependancies on
> HTTP stuff right? I think Parameterparser just contains a
> hashMap of the
> data we need, if we could extract the HashMap from
> Parameterparser and
> pass that to the Fulcrum version (of Intake) we could extract the
> required data from there?
>
> Colin
>
> >
> >Comments?
> >
> >Eric
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Scott Eade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 3:20 AM
> >>To: Turbine Developers List
> >>Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine-2/xdocs changes.xml
> >>
> >>
> >>Colin Chalmers wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I want to refactor some intake stuff to make it simplier to
> >>>understand, this will be going into the 2.4 release. Will
> >>>
> >>>
> >>probably be
> >>
> >>
> >>>running a few things by you for feedback if you don't mind.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>You seem
> >>
> >>
> >>>to be using the Intake service quite intensly?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Fine, but if you want me to try anything I will most likely
> only have
> >>applications running on 2.3.1-dev, not 2.4-dev.
> >>If you search way back in the mail archives you can find
> >>reference to an
> >>extension to Intake that provided client side validation using
> >>JavaScript.  JavaScript would be no substitute for validation on the
> >>server, but it could improve the user experience.  It could be
> >>interesting to integrate this if you have some time on your hands.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Let me know if 2.3.1 Intake is now performing as expected.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>AFAIK the only outstanding problem relates to the use format of the
> >>values returned by DateString.  I am avoiding this by not
> >>using DateString.
> >>
> >>Thanks for your patch - it saved me digging deeper into
> Intake than I
> >>already have.
> >>
> >>Scott
> >>
> >>--
> >>Scott Eade
> >>Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd.
> >>http://www.backstagetech.com.au
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to