I am also concerned with lack of interest in commons components. I submitted a patch to commons-dev in June to add support for upload progress reporting and despite reminders and occasional 'I'll get to it as soon as I can' responses the code has neither been accepted nor rejected.
I'd like to see a patched version of the file-upload code in fulcrum as an option for users. Regards, Peter On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 19:31, Eric Pugh wrote: > Hi all, > > Well, the results where somewhat inconclusive.. There where 3 +1's, but two > comments that depending on code with questionable support can be bad. And I > kinda want to change my vote to a -1! > > I'd like to change my vote to a -1, as I know this code will NEVER EVER > leave sandbox, and adding yet another dependency doesn't make sense. It's > three little classes that aren't rocket science. I am going to fix the code > in turbine 2.4, and I'd like someone to convince me why we should depend on > it. The code entered sandbox when lots of good parts of Turbine where > pulled out (like the basis for commons-lang). > > Eric > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 3:59 AM > > To: Turbine Developers List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add dependency on commons-http? > > > > > > > > > > Scott Eade wrote: > > > > > > > >> [x] Yes, delete the deprecated code and add a dependency > > on commons-http > > >> [ ] No, fix the deprecated code, and undeprecate it. > > >> > > > BUT: commons-http is not being maintained by anyone at present - it > > > doesn't even appear on the commons components page and the > > last commit > > > was 7 months ago. > > > I use commons-http in my application so as to avoid the deprecation > > > warning from BrowserDetector, but commons-http needs to be > > patched in > > > order to do what I want (public access to the constants), > > but due to > > > the low level of attention commons-http gets my patch was > > lost in the > > > massive flow of traffic that is commons-dev: > > > > > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=commons-de > [EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=32393 > > > > > > commons-http is a really small component - I agree that it should be > > fixed and then released. If there is not enough interest in releasing > > it then I think it should be rolled it back into turbine. > > > My first reaction would be to roll-it-back. Depending on something that > has a questionable communiy/backing is bit a good idea. > > Stephen. > > > > > > > Scott > > > > -- > > Stephen J. McConnell > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > |------------------------------------------------| > | Magic by Merlin | > | Production by Avalon | > | | > | http://avalon.apache.org/merlin | > | http://dpml.net/ | > |------------------------------------------------| > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Peter Courcoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
